Here are the design drawings created for us by Douglas Stenhouse (Architect and Water Color Artist). These drawing were then re-created in 3-D to look like what you see on the main earthbag village open source hub. Creating them in 3-D allowed us to correct many problems and add in additional details. You can download the complete Sketchup 3-D file by clicking here: SKETCHUP EARTHBAG VILLAGE 3-D.
Earthbag Village Updated Layout Including 6-dome Clusters – Click for Main Open Source Hub
Earthdome Custom Furniture – Click to Visit the Details Page
6-Dome Cluster, 3-Dome Cluster, ADA 3-Dome Cluster – Click to Enlarge
Click to Enlarge
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
For the structural analysis of the earthbag structures, Da Ku used the mechanical properties of low standard concrete (Young’s Modulus 2.2*10^10 Pa) and the experiments on earthbags from our partners at EarthbagBuilding.com (Young’s Modulus 2*10^7 Pa). The final results do not differ very much:
Structural Analysis of an Earthdome
The maximum compression stress (16 psi) is much lower than the strength, which showed these structures are strong. We also looked at testing of polypropylene earthbags and found strengths of 43.06 psi, 57.84 psi, and 311 psi – plus other people’s results from the EarthbagBulding.com website that also confirmed strengths greater than 200 psi. While everyone should do their own calculations to confirm these numbers, we feel confident building with this approach.
EARTHBAG VILLAGE DESIGN DETAILS
One Community is taking an open source project-launch blueprinting approach to everything we do. The following structure is purposed to clearly share our design parameters and goals in a duplicable and easily modifiable format. This structure is purposed to comprehensively address challenges before they arise while easily and transparently tracking the evolution of of all aspects of this component (through both top-down and bottom-up changes) until it is complete. In the following systems engineering approach:
“Shall” statements are specifics that will be met because we consider them essential
“Will” statements are considered important but with built-in flexibility if it is needed
“Could” and “Should” statements are goals and possibilities we hope to achieve, but not required
LEVEL 1: CONCEPT OF OPERATION
This is the summary of what we are creating.
This village shall demonstrate maximum affordability
This village shall be built using earthbag construction
This village shall be scalable to meet individual needs
Dome homes (construction plans will be added here)
LEVEL VII: ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS
These are the instructions for building the Level VI: Components, to create the Level V: Subsystems, that then create the Level III: Systems. Assembly instructions will be included in each of the component hubs (Food, Energy, Tropical Atrium, Shower and Toilet Domes, etc.) and also listed here for easy reference. Additional trouble-shooting guides will be included and detailed on these two pages:
To demonstrate maximally space and resource efficient housing
To demonstrate a size most people in other US counties will be able to build without permits
The purpose of these living units is primarily for sleeping and intimacy – socialization areas, entertainment rooms, recreation space, kitchens, etc. are instead incorporated elsewhere (see the SEGO Center, Tropical Atrium, etc.) and the fulfilled living model and other design elements of One Community is focused on providing an unparalleled diversity of options for both active lifestyles and private spaces for retreat and relaxation
Q: How much will it cost to build the entire village?
The earthbag village will be built within a 15-minute relaxed walk of the SEGO Center.
Q: What is the bathroom and shower to living-unit ratio, and how far are they from the homes?
For this seventy-two unit village there are 24 bathroom stalls and 20 showers built into the layout. The units the farthest away from the showers are about 120 ft (36.58 m) away. The units the farthest away from the bathrooms are about 150 ft (45.72 m) away.
Q: Why is the village designed to fit on only 1 acre?
With the growing population of the planet, we see maximizing space efficiency as an essential component of sustainability. From a Highest Good society perspective, we also see people choosing to live closely together versus distancing themselves as a growth and communication opportunity. Other reasons for this choice include:
Makes replication easier
Reduces environmental impact
Lowers costs for energy and plumbing infrastructure
Lowers costs for road infrastructure needed for fire code
For properties (like ours) that are zoned agricultural and commercial, property taxes are based on the specific use of the land. The higher the agricultural-use to residential-use ratio, the lower property taxes will be
Q: How will privacy be addressed with the dome clusters being so close together?
Privacy will be addressed primarily through grouping of like-minded people and communication with each other. The domes construction also makes them very good for containing sound and easy to make private by pulling shades. It is also important to note that additional private spaces, socialization spaces, and recreation spaces are all within a short walk.